A Complete History of England, from the First Entrance of the Romans under the conduct of Julius Cæsar, unto the end of the Reign of King Henry III.

Bound in full blind stamped contemporary calf. The spine with six compartments and five raised bands. A newer red lettering piece in the second compartment from the top. Boards scuffed but still in very good condition with the corners straight and the boards showing only superficial cracking. A small split to the bottom edge of the rear board (see photographs).

Internally the front free endpaper with a cut out section at the top. The contents clean and free of stains or water marks. Slight age toning to the leaves.

Please take the time to view the slideshow in order to gain a better appreciation of the contents and condition.

Per Wikipedia: Robert Brady MD (1627–1700) was an English academic and historical writer supporting the royalist position in the reigns of Charles II of England and James II of England. He was also a physician.

Biography

Brady was son of Thomas Brady, an attorney of Denver, Norfolk. He was educated in Downham Market and at Caius College, Cambridge. He was made Master of Caius College in 1660, on the English Restoration. In the 1670s, he hoped to write for the prominent politicians Joseph Williamson and Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, but they declined the offer. It was only when William Sancroft became Archbishop of Canterbury that Brady found a patron.

Beginning in 1677, Brady held the position of Regius Professor of Physic at Cambridge. He sat as Member of Parliament for the University in 1681 and 1685.

In historical controversy, he was opposed to William Petyt and James Tyrrell, along what would become Tory versus Whig lines, then forming in the Exclusion crisis of the 1680s. Brady is regarded as holding to an uncompromising royalist position. Others on the Whig side were William Atwood, Edward Cooke, and Sir John Somers.

P. Kenyon takes him as a pioneer among the royalist scholars of English medieval history, who were working towards a formulation akin to Kenyon’s viewpoint. John Pocock regards as “unforgettably damaging” the effect the (proto)-Tory Brady and others made, in attacking the doctrine of the “Ancient Constitution” as a failed description of the real circumstances of political arrangements in the England of the Middle Ages. On the narrow point of the actual legal effects of the Norman Conquest, Brady had been anticipated by Samuel Daniel, in views that are quite close to some modern scholars. He moved from there to argue for absolutism, and that Magna Carta was not a major charter for popular freedom. Brady’s ideas drew on Henry Spelman and Robert Filmer.

David C. Douglas remarks that although his motivations as a scholar were at least as political as those of his opponents, his techniques were so far superior that his work remained of importance. Brady was aided in his later work by a position from 1686 in the archives of the Tower of London.